DWI Slams Atiku Over Call For Nnamdi Kanu’s Release

The Democracy Watch Initiative (DWI), has strongly condemned former Vice President Atiku Abubakar over his recent call for the unconditional release of the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, describing the stance as “foolhardy, arrogant, and deeply contradictory.”

In a statement signed by its Director of Strategic Communication, Dr. Tunji Bamidele, the group accused Atiku of political hypocrisy and inconsistency, saying his position raises questions about his commitment to justice, national unity, and the rule of law.

He said: “Atiku’s political philosophy and personal integrity. His stance can be characterized as foolhardy, arrogant, and deeply contradictory, raising serious questions about his commitment to justice and national unity.

“Atiku Abubakar, in his pursuit of political capital, has chosen to align himself with a figure who stands accused of grave offenses against the Nigerian state. Nnamdi Kanu is currently facing serious charges, including terrorism and treasonable felony, which involve incitement to insurrection, the killings of security personnel, and the destruction of public and private property.

“These are not mere allegations; they represent a significant threat to the stability and security of our nation. By advocating for Kanu’s unconditional release, Atiku not only undermines the rule of law but also sends a dangerous message to those who have suffered at the hands of Kanu’s actions.

The group expressed dismay that Atiku would “challenge President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s decision to pardon small-scale offenders while simultaneously supporting Kanu’s release,” describing it as a “glaring contradiction.

He added, “How can one advocate for leniency towards a figure accused of inciting violence and chaos while condemning the same leniency for lesser offenders? This inconsistency is not merely a flaw in his argument; it is a reflection of a deeper insecurity in his political identity.

“We must consider the implications of Atiku’s stance on the families of the security personnel who have lost their lives in the line of duty. How does Atiku expect the families of these brave individuals to react to the prospect of Kanu’s release? What message does this send to the families of innocent citizens who have also suffered due to the violence and unrest incited by Kanu and his followers?

“To advocate for Kanu’s release without justice being served is to disregard the pain and suffering of countless Nigerians who have been affected by his actions. It is an affront to the memories of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice for our nation.

“Atiku’s call for Kanu’s release risks undermining the morale of our security forces. The men and women who serve in the armed forces do so with the understanding that their sacrifices are recognized and that justice will prevail. To release Kanu as Atiku proposes would send a demoralizing message: that those who threaten the integrity of the state can evade accountability.

“Such a precedent would not only discourage current personnel from making sacrifices but may also dissuade potential recruits from joining the armed forces. The implications for national security are profound and troubling.

“It is important to recognize that the rule of law must prevail in all circumstances. Nnamdi Kanu must face trial and, if found guilty, be punished appropriately for his actions. Justice is not merely a concept to be manipulated for political gain; it is a fundamental principle that underpins the very fabric of our society. Atiku Abubakar’s support for Kanu’s release, therefore, represents a dangerous deviation from this principle and an affront to the rule of law.

“The Democracy Watch Initiative categorically rejects Atiku Abubakar’s support for the unconditional release of Nnamdi Kanu. This position is not only unjustifiable but also reflects a troubling inconsistency that undermines his credibility as a leader.”

The group urged Nigerians to critically reassess Atiku’s suitability for leadership positions in light of what it described as “his indifference to the tragic loss of life, particularly the over 500 Northerners and law enforcement officers killed as a result of Kanu’s incitement.

“A leader must demonstrate genuine concern for the welfare of all citizens, and Atiku’s lack of response to such a grave humanitarian crisis suggests a troubling disregard for the very lives he seeks to represent. Therefore, we urge the public to reconsider their support for his candidacy.”